Over the past few weeks I have checked in some of my Prum 2001's. I went to Dovetail restaurant on the UWS and the meal was horrible. I had halibut that was hard as a brick and oxtail I needed a chainsaw to cut through, plus it was all salty. So glad I brought my own. I brought the 2001 J.J. Prum Graacher Himmelreich Spatlese and thank god I did as that was about the only decent thing served to me, and I brought it! The wine was sublime. No sulfur, old barrel or yeast aromas. Just pure Mosel goodness. Slate and nice green-like fruit. Incredibly aromatic. The palate's first impression was ACID! Soon though the pieces came into place and this wine was classic Graach. Rocky and mineral with wonderful elegant finesse and perfect almost surreal balance. A touch of petrol on the nose began to come through but this was just starting to get into secondary land. In five more years it might be fully secondary. Graacher Himelreich from Prum I prefer in it's youth because it is accessible and also the wine that this vineyard yields, for me, performs better in its youth. Especially at Prum, but also at Schaefer and F. Weins Prum. The wine had a crunchy minerality and crunchy acid which is a result of Graach and a result of 2001. 2001 was the last vintage where you got true, real deal acidity. Bright, crunchy, tasty and attacks your mouth like a young Muscadet. No need to rush on this but think it is in an ideal place right now and even the Prums say the Graach is better young and that is where they prefer to drink it. It can age, but why as I find after a certain point it dulls and you dont get the energy you do when the wine is less than 15 years old.
I recently dined at a killer Korean restaurant in Littleneck called, well I don't remember, but it was fantastic. I brought a 2001 J.J. Prum Wehlener Sonnenuhr Spatlese and it was very good yet very different than the Graacher Himmelreich. Creamy as Wehlener always is with a good acid backbone but it did not seem to get to the place yet where I like my WS Spatlese to be texturally. It demands at least 20-30 years of age to get there and longer for the Auslese. It had incredible balance but did not have that spherical quality you get on the palate with really great WS from Prum. It killed with all the food and had nice fruit, that was still all primary, no hint of petrol at all. The structure was impressive, as in 2001, even the small wines and QBA's had incredible structure. There was something missing and that will arrive, but only with age. A lovely wine but if you have any, hold off for ten more years.
Hey Lyle--
ReplyDeleteSince you're an experienced hand, can I ask what the strategy is when a Prum does turn out to be stinky stinky--decant, I assume, but how long does it take to dissipate?
Many thanks for the notes. Keep em coming.
I think the Prum stink goes away after 5 years, but every time I have tasted at the estate out of barrel I do not get it. Very strange.
ReplyDeleteThe ultimate strategy is wait five years. I hate the stink. But young Prum is desired (it is sometimes), decant heavily, sometimes one or two days, the wines won't budge, but the stank will.
Lyle,
ReplyDeleteIt's nice to see you getting back on the horse. Keep up the good work; you definitely always have something interesting to read in the world of riesling and German wines.
jqmunro
Thanks for the response. My question was prompted by the experience of drinking a 97 GH auslese a couple of months ago. It was still seriously endowed with stink, leaving me a bit baffled. A restaurant bottle, though, so maybe not representative.
ReplyDeleteI've alway's been critical of Prum and his overuse of sulfur. I'm not exactly sure why we are sugar coating it by calling it "prum stink".
ReplyDeleteI have noticed it stronger in certain vintages. The '97's and '99's seem to be the worst offenders. I also think Sonnenhuer tends to be sulfured more than Himmelreich.
I've never been a fan of Prum's Himmelriech, but I like your review - Rock's. Ironically I had some show up this week in a case i purchased last fall. I look forward to ripping some corks.
BTW: Drank a bottle of '95 Albert Belle 'Cuvee Louis Belle', last night. Pretty damn good. Not as raw or energetic as Graillot, but certainly very tasty. The bottle had also just been shipped, so maybe there is some upside for the remaining 6 bottles.
Iuli,
ReplyDeleteI call it the stink because it is not just sulphur which is a misconception, it is a combo of s02, spontaneous yeast aromas, cellar aromas and old barrel aromas. And yes '97 and '99 were particularly affected.